Today I spoke about the digital ethics (‘adab’ – Indonesian) at a Webinar held by the Muhammadiyah High School IV Depok, West Java. The audience was mostly students, with a few school teachers also participating.
I focused on few issues, prevalent among youth in the cyberspace. That includes hoax, cyber bullying, stalker harassment and social media abuses.
Above all, I emphasised on the need to keep your faith and integrity wherever, whenever you are.
Key takeaways: Q.S Al-Isra’: 36 and Q.S Al-Hujurat: 10-12.
Note: this short article was published by the New Straits Times (NST) Online on Friday, 29th May 2020 at this link.
We were reminded by Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin (NST, 16 May 2020) to ensure continued education with new methods of online and remote teaching and learning (RTL). He said this must be strengthened as e-learning is the future of education.Teachers and lecturers must develop their skills with this new normal. With necessary skills and knowledge, RTL will not be less fun and interesting. In contrary, being unfamiliar with how technology works may lead to some legal complications. Therefore in conducting RTL, educators also need to take care of those legal risks so as not to end up in a legal mess and potential liabilities.
There are three major legal risks educators and learning institutions need to anticipate in RTL, namely identification, content, and communication.
As learning institutions are now going massively online due to the Covid-19 pandemic crisis, questions arise how “secure” it is technically, operationally and legally for schools and universities to launch and execute their online and remote teaching and learning (“RTL”) activities. For many institutions who have never considered this seriously before, RTL can be a serious challenge, either conceptually or operationally, or both.
This is part of the new norm we are forced to accept, with social distancing and lockdown at various levels are now the norm rather than the exception.
This post is about a keynote I delivered in an International Webinar organized by Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya. The Webinar went well, attended by a crowd of around 100 Zoomizens (yes, it was on Zoom application).
Even though the theme of this international web seminar was the implications of Covid-19 pandemic crisis over cyber security, other speakers did speak about a wide array of legal topics including the implication on employment law, emergency law, criminal law as well as public international law.
In my presentation, I first highlighted the development of the pandemic in Malaysia including the legal basis of Movement Control Order (MCO) in Malaysia. Next, I observed and assessed the ensuing implications including Policy Implications; Social Implication; and Cyber Security Implication
The social implication includes the following:
Lesser people on the road and the flocking of people in the cyberspace makes it more attractive hunting ground for cybercriminals.
More online shopping and online selling, so a better chance to hide their illegitimate and fraudulent transactions by picking popular items such as face masks, sanitizers, vaccines, etc.
More activities on social media makes it a perfect platform for launching phishing attacks.
Making use of emotions and curiosity on what is going on, easy to entice attention: e.g. infection data, patients’ personalities, donation drive.
Zoom-bombing adalah istilah populer bagi kegiatan sabotase yang dilakukan terhadap aplikasi meeting online yang akhir-akhir ini sedang naik daun yaitu Zoom. Contoh sabotase itu adalah penyusupan seseorang yang ingin membuat onar dan mengganggu jalannya pertemuan.
Dalam beberapa insiden terkini, masalah zoom-bombing bukan pada kelemahan teknis seperti bugs, design dll. Tapi lebih pada penyelenggaraan (governance).
Ibarat mobil dicuri, lebih disebabkan karena mobilnya yang tidak dikunci, atau tidak sempurna nguncinya, atau dikunci tapi duplikatnya ditaruh diluar mobil.
Maka sekadar penekanan untuk kita semua yg mau bikin Zoom meeting, ada bbrp langkah pengamanan a.l:
1. Untuk host, harap mengaktifkan *waiting room* agar bisa dipastikan bahwa yg masuk itu terverifikasi.
Dikarenakan kondisi darurat pergerakan akibat pandemi Covid-19 saat ini, beberapa produk dan jasa bisnis meroket karena permintaan meningkat. Food delivery, e-commerce portal dan online meeting platform di antara yang menangguk keuntungan. Zoom sendiri sudah menorehkan peningkatan pemakaian 20 kali lipat. Biasanya hanya 10 juta meeting online perbulan, kini setidaknya ada 200 juta meeting online sebulan.
Pertanyaan yang kini banyak dilontarkan masyarakat: Amankah untuk memakai Zoom?
Zoom ini layaknya banyak platform media online lainnya seperti Skype, Google Hangouts dan lain lain. Masing-masing ada kelebihan dan kekurangan baik dari segi setting (setelan), features (spesifikasi) teknis dan non-teknis, ongkos ataupun fasilitas lainnya.
Zoom, seperti layaknya produk lain, sangat mungkin memiliki kekurangan dan kelemahan sistem. Apakah yang lain itu aman? Ketika banyak kasus curi mobil yang melibatkan mobil merek tertentu, apakah karena mobil mereka lain lebih aman? Tidak juga. Mungkin saja karena mobil merek itu adalah yang paling banyak penggunanya sehingga lebih mudah dipelajari, lebih mudah dicari kuncinya dan lebih mudah dijual hasil curiannya.
Ketika penggunaan Zoom meningkat sampai 20 kali ganda, perlu dipahami dari dua sisi: Pengguna dan Penyedia jasa. Dari sisi ppengguna, banyak sekali dari mereka yang baru pertama kali memakai platform seperti ini. Banyak diantara mereka yang baru sekali itu melakukan online meeting. Malah parahnya, banyak juga di antara mereka yang baru pertama kali menggunakan teknologi internet! Bisa dibayangkan apakah para pengguna ini mengerti tentang seluk beluk lalu lintas Internet yang penuh dengan risiko dan rambu-rambunya?
Kedua, pemilik Zoom bisa dijangka kewalahan saat mendapatkan durian runtuh ini. Ada tiga hal yang setidaknya harus mereka sediakan: 1. Setelan teknis, 2. Business process, dan 3. Sumber daya manusia. Apakah Zoom telah siap dalam ketiga hal tersebut untuk menerima luapan pengguna dalam sekelip mata?
Data is asset in today’s interconnected world. With the changing digital lifestyle and emerging digital workplace, managing personal data becomes a key trust factor for organisations.
The digitalisation of process and records, mobile workplace concept, synchronisation of gadgets and data, as well as emergence of smart contract have all contributed to this change.
Internally, managing data serves as a critical assets management. Externally, it becomes a shield of legal compliance as well as a key competitive value in a more increasingly regulated environment.
Everyone now speaks about this COVID-19, the latest Corona virus epidemic which started in China recently and had now affected over 45,000 people worldwide, and killed more than 1,200 people. People talk about it because it is everyone’s concern. It is about life and death (beyond just economy!).
The problem now is, we have too much information to the extent that it is so hard to identify the truth behind each piece of information. Some of those info may have led to increasing fear and panic. I believe this is not what we want: mixing facts with fiction, then distorting our priorities.
It is interesting to note recently (the past few days) that some penal sanctions were upheld by courts in Malaysia against those who are found to spread fake news or information about COVID-19. Here are some excerpts from one media report (The Star Online, 13 Feb 2020):
Friday, 13th December 2019 – I am scheduled to address the IT Law Class in AIKOL, IIUM discussing the topic of Personal Data Protection Law in Malaysia. The slides can be obtained here: PDP LAW for IT Law Class 131219.
Friday, 13th December 2019 – I am scheduled to address the IT Law Class in AIKOL, IIUM discussing the topic of Personal Data Protection Law in Malaysia. The slides can be obtained here: 