Spent about half an hour with Danny Weitzner (MIT) on my ongoing research. Danny commented couple of things especially on my methodological aspects, which I think I’d better store them here.
He initially agreed with me on the use of CIA (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability) concept as a model for my framework. However, he notes that such information security concept may not necessarily make a good regulatory framework, i.e. it’s an option. More importantly, he stressed on e priority or the first question should be what risk(s) is being addressed here? For whose interests? Etc.
The common failure of the regulatory framework, Danny argued, is that the law does not reflect the development of the technology. It must pass certain neutrality standards, such as technical neutrality as well as architectural neutrality. Need to learn from the American Privacy act (on wiretap, etc) that had not passed the architectural neutrality.
On the source of data: Danny agreed it is very important to approach the regulators, lawyers and computer scientists/practitioners; however, asking consumers’ may not be easy. It can be appropriately taken out.
Also, while it is interesting to assess whether or not CIA template is useful (eg the problem might lay heavily on confidentiality as opposed to other elements), it is far more important to understand what or where the existing law has failed. For this, it is very useful to ask people in the law enforcement, i.e. police, etc: ‘what are their problems in implementing the law?’
On top of that, Danny further emphasised the importance of comparative study with other countries/jurisdictions. Given the experience and exposures Danny as an academic possesses, this lunch chat was great.
Thanks Danny! (p.s.: Since 30th July 2009, Danny has been appointed to run the US Government Internet Policy Unit under the new US administration)
Menu: …. (have to ask Gerry again, he knew the names of all the food served!)
The summer school students and faculties were having very delicious dinner serving Middle-Eastern food. I was sitting next to Professor Gerald J. Sussman from MIT and Prof Bill Dutton, the director of the OII. We had a warm and friendly chats, especially with Prof Gerald (or Gerry), ranging from American politics & election to Indonesian coffee (Gerry surprisingly mentioned a fact which i don’t know, that the best coffee from indonesia is ‘Mandailing coffee’). We also chat about one of the best movies each of us had watched: The Beautiful Minds.
I have to thank Gerry especially for his brief insight on what I need to include in my research. He particularly suggested the inclusion of the issue of product liability pertaining to consumer protection against defective software, etc., so as not to unjustifiably cause the loss it the users.
We dispersed at around 10pm. and spray of rain started, briefly lasted though. Thanks to the OII for the treat!
Kevin from the States told us this story in his presentation. Since he was six or so, he was taught how to understand and protect copyright for his works. In order to establish such right, they believed they would have to write a letter to themselves, writing about the work and right established thereform, and sent to themselves through a post office (kevin, correct me if I’m wrong). Once received, the envelope would be kept without first opening the content. So it’s kept selaed. This would become a proof in future to show that the copyright over his particular work does exist. This was known as ‘poorman’s copyright’.
Thanks to Faisal abu Azama dan Halim Abu Abdil Aziz…. mereka nganter aku ke KL Sentral. Terus ambil ERL ke KLIA. Sekarang waktu menunjukkan jam 3.13 pagi. Aku udah duduk lebih sejam nunggu di luar boarding room. Insya Allah sebentar lagi boarding. Pesawat ke Doha dijadualkan jam 4.15, Kelihatannya cukup rame juga yang boarding. Tapi sampe Qatar nanti pasti nyebar. Hmm.. aku udah ga sabar pengen dapet senderan bisa tidur… badan capek dan agak kurang enak badan. untung tadi istriku tersayang udah nelpon, dan sebelumnya juga udah ngobrol banyak ama ayah ibu.. dan udah denger suara Utaz dan Ulya juga… jadi pikiran dan perasaanku tenaang… Bismillah. Mau boarding dulu…
I recently read another encouraging development pertaining to the cyberlaw in Indonesia. The ICT Minister mentioned that the convergence of national laws relating to ICT is underway. He mentioned that the two acts on telecommunications and broadcast (UU Telekomunikasi & UU Penyiaran) are going to be merged and redrafted. This is very very positive development. While the technologies are becoming convergent, we don’t see why the law should address the issues separately. It is a major work for sure. But no matter how difficult, costly and complicated it is, the benefit is much bigger that that for the long run.
I’ll write more about the convergence of law in due course…
On 13-27 July 2008, I am attending the SDP 2008 at the Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford, UK.
The Oxford Internet Institute’s annual Summer Doctoral Programme (SDP) brings together students from around the world for up to three weeks of study with leading academics in the field of Internet Studies, and provides an academic framework in which to share and discuss students’ current research.