“Mirror mirror on FB Wall… Should you comment of them all?!”

(CASE CHAT ON ONLINE DEFAMATION)

By Sonny Zulhuda

ImageThe online wall that you have on your Facebook or other social networking sites is not like a wall in your private bedroom where you can always at your own freedom stick things from your own photos to class schedules, to your favorite Football Club posters. Those things would remain as your “private’ enjoyment and view.

But things that you, or others, post on your social networking sites wall is not private. There are people who share such wall and are ready to read your posts every time you have something new.

So this is a rather common-sense thing; just be careful, mindful and.. don’t do fool!

Let me just share with you this incident:

“Retiree to pay RM100,000 over FB posts

It was reported by the Star on October 1st, 2011, that a retiree from Penang has been ordered by a High Court here to pay a total of RM100,000 in damages and costs to a private automotive technology training centre where his son had studied over three defamatory postings on Facebook.

It was said that the man had grouses after his son failed the London-based City & Guilds examination for his diploma in Vehicle Maintenance and Repair, and he “went on a warpath” against the centre by posting comments on Facebook accusing the centre of criminal and inappropriate activities. This took place in November and December 2010. The centre then sued the person for defamation over three comments that the latter posted on the social networking website.

In the court, the person alleged that his grouses were based on three areas that irked him – that the centre was not incorporated, that it had pre-dated and post-dated its students’ portfolios, and the high failure rate of the City & Guilds exam among its students. The court however accepted the explanations given by the plaintiff (the Centre).

Justice Varghese George Varughese ordered the defendant pay DeSpark Auto (Penang) Sdn Bhd RM60,000 in general damages, RM15,000 in aggravated damages and RM25,000 in costs (so, a total of RM100,000!). Besides, an injunction was also given to restrain the defendant from further publication of any material in the nature of the three defamatory postings in any media.

More report from the Star daily.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • August 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Jul   Oct »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Visitor

    free counters

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,582 other followers